2008-05-13T13:52:41Z http://carbonnation.org/comments/atom.aspx Quick Blog tag:carbonnation.org,2008-05-08:1030239 J Bonds 2008-05-08T13:10:00Z 2008-05-08T13:10:00Z
I wrote "lessening" above because, unfortunately, it seems that the time for completely averting crisis has passed.]]> tag:carbonnation.org,2008-05-06:1025726 Philip H. http://www.districtofcolumbiadispatches.blogspot.com 2008-05-06T16:36:43Z 2008-05-06T16:36:43Z tag:carbonnation.org,2008-05-04:1021010 Istvan Holbok http://www.eusag.ch 2008-05-04T11:57:18Z 2008-05-04T11:57:18Z
Dear Sir,

Our company is specialized in research and development in the field of environmentally sound technologies.

We know this letter is totally unbelievable because the yesterday's physics and chemistry did not resolve the CO2 emission problem up today on the commercially viable way .

Clear Air is our solution for carbon dioxide (CO2) emission reduction produced from the combustion of fossil fuels. Now available.

Our CO2 Emission Reduction Technology called Clear Air, can be quickly implemented in the different fields of application including smoke stacks, and land-sea-air transport. CO2 emission reduction is done in-situ with an optimal reduction of 99.9%. This solution has not secondary polluting effect.

Clear Air is an effective and relatively cheap technology, mounted behind the CO2 source.
For example in a car mounted on the exhaust system it is capable to reduce the CO2 emission from 40% even up to 99.9%.
In the case of passenger cars or heavy goods vehicle or large off road vehicles the technology of construction and manufacturing does not need to change.
The Clear Air device can be mounted onto the existing parts of the vehicle.

The Clear Air know-how together with a manufactured prototype is our property. The efficiency is measurable and can be immediately tested. Exact technology exists with computerized modeling for the CO2 reduction process and a controllable prototype equipment for use as well.

The principle behind the CO2 emission reductions solution is part of a secret know-how. The intellectual property is offered for use by Licensing (Technology Transfer).

The Environmental Unique Solutions AG. is delivering only technology and know-how for the Clear Air, in form of Customized Licenses.
We do not manufacture and sell the device based on this technology.
(More information at the site: www.eusag.ch/clearair.html">http://www.eusag.ch/clearair.html )

Kindest regards

Istvan Holbok
Executive Officer of Administration

Environmental Unique Solutions A.G.
Baarerstrasse 21, 6304 Zug Switzerland
WEB: www.eusag.ch
E-mail: istvan.holbok@eusag.ch
Cellular phone: +36-70-3420900]]> tag:carbonnation.org,2008-04-28:1006904 Philip H. http://www.districtofcolumbiadispatches.blogspot.com 2008-04-28T12:35:08Z 2008-04-28T12:35:08Z tag:carbonnation.org,2008-04-04:945101 Neil Gussman 2008-04-04T18:39:12Z 2008-04-04T18:39:12Z Glad you liked the book. I'll check back on your blog. Here's mine--very different topic: http://armynow.blogspot.com
Neil]]> tag:carbonnation.org,2008-03-21:909094 Laelaps http://scienceblogs.com/laelaps 2008-03-21T09:34:56Z 2008-03-21T09:34:56Z
My criticism to Chris' post was written quickly (I was leaving work at the time), but I would have been more sympathetic if something other than "promote good books" was offered as an alternative to keeping quiet. I think scientists should respond to pseudoscience, but that doesn't mean that every response is a good one.

What comes to mind (and what I forgot to mention) is that Darwin was intimately familiar with Paley's "Natural Theology," and that knowledge shaped what we wrote in On the Origin. He didn't directly confront creationism (it would be seen as a direct attack on revealed religion), but he organized his arguments based upon the favorite examples of the famous theologian, therefore simultaneous undercutting creationism and supporting his own theory of evolution by natural selection. I'd like this sort of approach be utilized more often; knowing creationist claims well enough to refute them without becoming shrill or overly antagonistic. Issues like creationism are so difficult to weed out because people are feeling threatened and they need to make a choice (or they make a choice because they don't want to get involved in a big argument). Direct refutation of bad science is still necessary, but if there is not a push towards positive science education, I fear we're going to risk being seen as a bunch of cranks.]]> tag:carbonnation.org,2008-02-28:860475 Tom Levenson http://inversesquare.wordpress.com 2008-02-28T15:46:05Z 2008-02-28T15:46:05Z http://inversesquare.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/ive-been-tagged-reading-and-writing-and-all-that-jazz/
albest, tom l.]]> tag:carbonnation.org,2008-02-26:854597 Coturnix http://scienceblogs.com/clock/ 2008-02-26T01:16:24Z 2008-02-26T01:16:24Z tagged">http://scienceblogs.com/clock/2008/02/123_the_goosedbook_meme.php">tagged.]]> tag:carbonnation.org,2008-02-10:822446 Lab Lemming http://lablemminglounge.blogspot.com/ 2008-02-10T23:15:22Z 2008-02-10T23:15:22Z tag:carbonnation.org,2007-12-11:705477 penelope trunk http://blog.penelopetrunk.com 2007-12-11T17:34:02Z 2007-12-11T17:34:02Z